Wyjaśnienie efektu Knobe’a w kontekście konfliktu norm


  • Bartosz Maćkiewicz Instytut Filozofii, Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Katarzyna Kuś Instytut Filozofii, Uniwersytet Warszawski

Słowa kluczowe:

Knobe Effect, intentional action, conflict of norms, Omission Account


In a famous study, Joshua Knobe (2003) found an asymmetry in the way people ascribe intentional action. We discuss two explanations of this phenomenon: a psychological one formulated by Knobe himself and the so-called Omissions Account proposed by Katarzyna Paprzycka (2016a), and then describe an empirical study we have conducted into lay judgments of the intentionality of actions performed by agents facing a conflict of norms. While neither account in its present form explains our data, we argue that a modification of Paprzycka’s solution has the conceptual resources to deal with them. By contrast, a similar modification of Knobe’s proposal is highly implausible.




Jak cytować

Maćkiewicz, B., & Kuś, K. (2017). Wyjaśnienie efektu Knobe’a w kontekście konfliktu norm. Filozofia Nauki, 25(4), 57–85. Pobrano z https://www.fn.uw.edu.pl/index.php/fn/article/view/872