Problem rozumienia sporu absolutyzm—relacjonizm

Autor

  • Mariusz Grygianiec Instytut Filozofii, Uniwersytet Warszawski

Słowa kluczowe:

Gołosz, absolutism, relationism, time, ontological dependence

Abstrakt

The text presents a response to Gołosz’s critique of my reconstruction of the absolutism/relationism debate, set out in the article Trwanie w czasie (Persistence through Time). I specify the objections I agree with and those about which I remain sceptical. I suggest that the main source of the controversy between Gołosz and me is, on the one hand, the traditional and somewhat schematic way of presentaion – on my part – of the positions in the dispute (dictated in part by the subject matter of the discussed article), and on the other hand, a persistent lack of a suitable, exhaustive analysis of the notion of ontological dependence which lies at the heart of the debate.

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2013-12-01

Jak cytować

Grygianiec, M. (2013). Problem rozumienia sporu absolutyzm—relacjonizm . Filozofia Nauki, 21(4), 125–129. Pobrano z https://www.fn.uw.edu.pl/index.php/fn/article/view/741