Czy potrzebna nam jest opozycja aprioryczne – aposterioryczne?

Autor

  • Barbara Tuchańska Instytut Filozofii, Uniwersytet Łódzki

Słowa kluczowe:

a priori knowledge, a priori justification, a priori insights, naturalism, rationalism, socio-historical conception of knowledge, the ideal of episteme

Abstrakt

I present modifications of the notion of the a priori knowledge (beliefs) or justification executed in the recent epistemological conceptions, and discuss difficulties raised in their empiricist criticisms. Next, I discuss a naturalist and a metaphysical extreme approaches to the a priori, and give arguments against the need for the acceptance of the a priori versus a posteriori opposition. My arguments refer to contemporary philosophical processes: the abandonment of the abstract concept of the cognizing subject, the rejection of the concept of language as a logical representational structure, and the demise of the ideal of episteme.

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2011-12-01

Jak cytować

Tuchańska, B. (2011). Czy potrzebna nam jest opozycja aprioryczne – aposterioryczne?. Filozofia Nauki, 19(4), 119–138. Pobrano z https://www.fn.uw.edu.pl/index.php/fn/article/view/663