Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz i polski spór o uniwersalia

Autor

  • Witold Marciszewski Zakład Logiki, Metodologii i Filozofii Nauki, Uniwersytet w Białymstoku

Abstrakt

When discussing Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz's role in philosophy, it is worthwhile recalling his participation in scholarly controversies. It was characteristic of his open mind that his taking part in debates was motivated by a vivid interest in various ways of thinking. Ajdukiewicz's intellectual power consisted, so to speak, in his ability of not to understand. This ability has brought him success in some important debates, concerning i.a. the classical logical concept of contradiction and the debate on universals raised in modern Poland with the nominalistic program of Stanislaw Lesniewski and Tadeusz Kotarbiński. In this latter debate Ajdukiewicz shows that when one says that individuals exist, the word „exist" refers to something different that in the statement that universals exist. In other words, the functor „is" has a different category in the definition of an individual from that appearing in the definition of a universal; hence there must be two different senses of the word „exist".

Pobrania

Opublikowane

1999-09-01

Jak cytować

Marciszewski, W. (1999). Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz i polski spór o uniwersalia. Filozofia Nauki, 7(3-4), 5–13. Pobrano z https://www.fn.uw.edu.pl/index.php/fn/article/view/229