Economic Models as Cultural Artifacts: A Philosophical Primer

Słowa kluczowe: philosophy of economics, cultural semiotics, economic models, cultural artifacts, modeling styles

Abstrakt

As economics became a model-based science, ontological nature, cognitive status, and practical uses of economic models came under the spotlight of philosophers of economics and economic methodologists. However, what was strikingly missing was the interest in the cultural dimension of economic modeling. Some calls for thematizing “cultural framework” (Mäki), “enculturation” (Goldschmidt, Remmele), or “culture patterns” (Benton) of economic models have appeared in recent years, and this paper aims at addressing such calls. To this end, we start with the artifactual approach to economic models (Morgan, Knuuttila, Halsmayer), which cuts across the idealization–construction debate, and complement this approach with the cultural-semiotic component, drawing from the symbolic anthropology of Clifford Geertz. We thus come up with an interpretation of economic models as cultural artifacts, which enables us to address the insufficiently explored question of style in economic modeling using Nelson Goodman’s semiotic account of style.

Bibliografia

Alexandrova A., Northcott R., Wright J. (2021), “Back to the Big Picture,” Journal of Economic Methodology 28(1), 54-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2020.1868772
Boon M., Knuuttila T. (2009), “Models as Epistemic Tools in Engineering Sciences” [in:] Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, A. Meijers (ed.), Amsterdam: Elsevier, 693-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51667-1.50030-6
Boumans M. (1999), “Built-In Justification” [in:] Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Sciences, M. S. Morgan, M. Morrison (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 66-96. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660108.005
Boumans M. (2001), “Fisher’s Instrumental Approach to Index Numbers,” History of Political Economy 33(5), 313-344. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-33-Suppl_1-313
Boumans M. (2005), “Models in Economics” [in:] Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy, J. B. Davis, A. Marciano, J. Runde (eds.), Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar, 260-282.
Boumans M. (2012a), “Mathematics as Quasi-Matter to Build Models as Instruments” [in:] Probabilities, Laws, and Structures: The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective 3, D. Dieks et al. (eds.), Springer, 307-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3030-4_22
Boumans M. (2012b), “Visualisations for Understanding Complex Economic Systems” [in:] Ways of Thinking, Ways of Seeing, ACES 1, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 145-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25209-9_7
Boumans M., Davis J. (2010), Economic Methodology: Understanding Economics as a Science, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bowles S., Gintis H. (2008), “Culture Matters: Inferences from Comparative Behavioral Experiments and Evolutionary Models” [in:] Explaining Culture Scientifically, M. J. Brown (ed.), Seattle–London: University of Washington Press, 211-227.
Brown M. J. (2008), “Introduction: Developing a Scientific Paradigm for Understanding Culture” [in:] Explaining Culture Scientifically, M. J. Brown (ed.), Seattle–London: University of Washington Press, 3-16.
Carrillo N., Knuuttila T. (2021), “An Artifactual Perspective on Idealization: Constant Capacitance and the Hodgkin and Huxley Model” [in:] Models and Idealizations in Science: Artefactual and Fictional Approaches, A. Cassini, J. Redmond (eds.), Cham: Springer, 51-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65802-1_2
Carrillo N., Knuuttila T. (2022), “Holistic Idealization: An Artifactual Standpoint,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 91, 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.10.009.
Chemla K., Keller E. F. (ed.) (2017), Cultures without Culturalism: The Making of Scientific Knowledge, Durham–London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822373094
Claveau F., Mireles-Flores L. (2014), “On the Meaning of Causal Generalisations in Policy-Oriented Economic Research,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28(4), 397-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2014.979669
Claveau F., Mireles-Flores L. (2016), “Causal Generalisations in Policy-Oriented Economic Research: An Inferentialist Analysis,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 30(4), 383-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2017.1331976
Dow S. C. (2012), Foundations for New Economic Thinking: A Collection of Essays, London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137000729
Elkana Y. (1981), “A Programmatic Attempt at an Anthropology of Knowledge” [in:] Sciences and Cultures: Anthropological and Historical Studies of the Sciences, E. Mendelsohn, Y. Elkana (eds.), Dordrecht: Reidel, 1-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8429-5_1
Eckert P. (2004), “The Meaning of Style,” Texas Linguistic Forum 47, 41-53.
Fernández R. (2008), “Culture and Economics” [in:] The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition, S. Durlauf, L. Blume (eds.), Basingstoke–New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2192-1
Fernández R. (2011), “Does Culture Matter?” [in:] Handbook of Social Economics, Vol. 1A, J. Benhabib, A. Bisin, M. O. Jackson (eds.), Elsevier, 481-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53187-2.00011-5
French S., Ladyman J. (1999), “Reinflating the Semantic Approach,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13, 103-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698599908573612
Frigg R. (2006), “Scientific Representations and the Semantic View of Theories,” Theoria 55, 49-65.
Frigg R., Nguyen J. (2016), “Scientific Representation” [in:] The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/scientific-representation
Frigg R., Nguyen J. (2017), “Models and Representation” [in:] Springer Handbook of Model Based Science, L. Magnani, T. Bertolotti (eds.), Cham: Springer, 49-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_3
Frigg R., Nguyen J. (2020), Modelling Nature: An Opinionated Introduction to Scientific Representation, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45153-0
Galison P. (1997), “Material Culture, Theoretical Culture, and Delocalization” [in:] Science in the Twentieth Century, J. Krige, D. Pestre (eds.), Amsterdam: Harwood, 669-682.
Geertz A. W. (2013), “The Meaningful Brain: Clifford Geertz and the Cognitive Science of Culture” [in:] Mental Culture: Classical Social Theory and the Cognitive Science of Religion, D. Xygalatas, W. W. McCorkle (eds.), London: Routledge, 176-196.
Geertz C. (1973), Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books.
Geertz C. (1980), Negara: The Theatre State in 19th Century Bali, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Geertz C. (1983), Local Knowledge, New York: Basic Books.
Geertz C. (2000), Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gelfert A. (2012), “Art History, the Problem of Style, and Arnold Hauser’s Contribution to the History and Sociology of Knowledge,” Studies in East European Thought 64, 121-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-012-9163-5
Gelfert A. (2015), “Symbol Systems as Collective Representational Resources: Mary Hesse, Nelson Goodman, and the Problem of Scientific Representation,” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4, 52-61.
Gelfert A. (2016), How to Do Science with Models: A Philosophical Primer, New York: Springer.
Gelfert A. (2017), “The Ontology of Models” [in:] Springer Handbook of Model Based Science, L. Magnani, T. Bertolotti (eds.), Cham: Springer, 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_1
Goldfarb R., Ratner J. (2008), “‘Theory’ and ‘Models’: Terminology through the Looking Glass,” Econ Journal Watch 5(1), 91-108.
Goldschmidt N., Remmele B. (2005), “Anthropology as the Basic Science of Economic Theory: Towards a Cultural Theory of Economics,” Journal of Economic Methodology 12(3), 455-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780500223783
Gombrich E. H. (1961), Art and Illusion, London: Phaidon Press.
Gonzalez J. W. (2013), “Value Ladenness and the Value-Free Ideal in Scientific Research” [in:] Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics, C. Luetge (ed.), Dordrecht: Springer, 1503-1521. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1494-6_78
Goodman N. (1978), Ways of Worldmaking, Indianapolis: Hackett.
Goodman N. (1984), Of Mind and Other Matters, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Guala F. (2012), “Are Preferences for Real? Choice Theory, Folk Psychology, and the Hard Case for Commonsensible Realism” [in:] Economics for Real: Uskali Mäki and the Place of Truth in Economics, A. Lehtinen, J. Kuorikoski, P. Ylikoski (eds.), Abingdon: Routledge, 137-155.
Guiso L., Sapienza P., Zingales L. (2006), “Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes?,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(2), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20.2.23
Gulick W. B. (1988), “Reconnecting Geertz’s Middle World,” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 71, 113-153.
Halsmayer V. (2014), “Review of Morgan Mary, The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 36, 380-382. https://doi.org/10.1017/S105383721400039X
Halsmayer V. (2018), “Following Artifacts,” History of Political Economy 50, 629-634. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-7023590
Halsmayer V. (2019), “Artifacts in the Contemporary History of Economics” [in:] A Contemporary Historiography of Economics, T. Düppe, E. R. Weintraub (eds.), New York: Routledge, 157-176. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315169194-10
Hands D. W. (2012), “Realism, Commonsensibles, and Economics: The Case of Contemporary Revealed Preference Theory” [in:] Economics for Real: Uskali Mäki and the Place of Truth in Economics, A. Lehtinen, J. Kuorikoski, P. Ylikoski (eds.), Abingdon: Routledge, 156-178.
Hausman D. (1998), “Problems with Realism in Economics,” Economics & Philosophy 14(2), 185-213. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267100003837
Heinemann W. (2010), “Reflexionen zum Verhältnis von Text und Stil,” Tekst i Dyskurs = Text und Diskurs 3, 145-165.
Hutchins E. (1995), Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001
Klein D., Romero P. (2007), “Model Building versus Theorizing: The Paucity of Theory in the Journal of Economic Theory,” Econ Journal Watch 4(2), 241-271.
Kmita J. (1985), Kultura i poznanie, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Kmita J. (1996), “Towards Cultural Relativism ‘with a Small R’” [in:] Epistemology and History: Humanities as Philosophical Problem and Jerzy Kmita’s Approach to It,
A. Zeidler-Janiszewska (ed.), Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 47, Amsterdam–Atlanta: Rodopi, 541-613.
Knorr Cetina K. (1991), “Epistemic Cultures: Forms of Reason in Science,” History of Political Economy 23(1), 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-23-1-105
Knuuttila T. (2009a), “Representation, Idealization, and Fiction in Economics: From the Assumptions Issue to the Epistemology of Modeling” [in:] Fiction in Science: Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization, M. Suarez (ed.), New York–London: Routledge, 205-231.
Knuuttila T. (2009b), “Isolating Representations versus Credible Constructions? Economic Modelling in Theory and Practice,” Erkenntnis 70, 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-008-9137-7
Knuuttila T. (2011), “Modelling and Representing: An Artefactual Approach to Model-Based Representation,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42, 262-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.034
Knuuttila T. (2021a), “Imagination Extended and Embedded: Artifactual versus Fictional Accounts of Models,” Synthese 198, S5077-S5097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1545-2
Knuuttila T. (2021b), “Epistemic Artifacts and the Modal Dimension of Modeling,” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00374-5
Knuuttila T., Voutilainen A. (2003), “A Parser as an Epistemic Artifact: A Material View on Models,” Philosophy of Science 70, 1484-1495. https://doi.org/10.1086/377424
Kralemann B., Lattman C. (2012), “The Semantics of Models: A Semiotic Philosophy of Science Approach” [in:] Semantics in Data and Knowledge Bases, K.-D. Schewe,
B. Thalheim (eds.), Berlin—Heidelberg: Springer, 50-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36008-4_3
Kralemann B., Lattmann C. (2013), “Models as Icons: Modeling Models in the Semiotic Framework of Peirce’s Theory of Signs,” Synthese 190(16), 3397-3420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0176-x
Kuorikoski J., Ylikoski P. (2014), “External Representations and Scientific Understanding,” Synthese 192, 3817-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0591-2
Leontief W. (1993), “Can Economics be Reconstructed as an Empirical Science?,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75, 2-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/75_Special_Issue.2
Lisciandra C., Korbmacher J. (2021), “Multiple Models, One Explanation,” Journal of Economic Methodology 28, 186-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2021.1892800
Longino H. (1990), Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry, Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691209753
Mäki U. (1999), “Representation Repressed: Two Kinds of Semantic Skepticism in Economics” [in:] R. R. Favretti, G. Sandri, R. Scazzieri (eds.), Incommensurability and Translation: Kuhnian Perspectives on Scientific Communication and Theory Change, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 307-321.
Mäki U. (2009), “MISSing the World: Models as Isolations and Credible Surrogate Systems,” Erkenntnis 70, 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-008-9135-9
Mäki U. (2009), “Realistic Realism about Unrealistic Models” [in:] The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics, H. Kincaid, D. Ross (eds.), New York: Oxford University Press, 68-98. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195189254.003.0004
Mäki U. (2018), “Rights and Wrongs of Economic Modelling: Refining Rodrik,” Journal of Economic Methodology 25(3), 218-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2018.1488475
Mäki U. (2021), “The Field: Tasks, Pasts, Futures,” Journal of Economic Methodology 28(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2020.1868766
Magnani L. (2009), Abductive Cognition: The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning, Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03631-6
Magnani L., Bertolotti T. (eds.) (2017), Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4
Magnani L., Casadio C. (eds.) (2016), Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology: Logical, Epistemological, and Cognitive Issues, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38983-7
Meskin A. (2005), “Style” [in:] The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, 2nd edition, B. N. Gaut, D. Lopes (eds.), Routledge, 489-500. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203390795_chapter_38
Mongin P. (2006), “Value Judgments and Value Neutrality in Economics,” Economica 73(290), 257-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2006.00501.x
Morgan M. S. (2012), The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026185
Morgan M. S. (2014), “What If? Models, Fact and Fiction in Economics,” Journal of British Academy 2, 231-268.
Morgan M. S., Knuuttila T. (2012), “Models and Modelling in Economics” [in:] Philosophy of Economics, U. Mäki (ed.), Amsterdam: Elsevier, 49-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51676-3.50003-8
Müller R. (2009), “The Notion of Model: A Historical Overview” [in:] Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, A. Meijers (ed.), Amsterdam: Elsevier, 637-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51667-1.50028-8
Nagatsu M., Poder K. (2019), “What is the Economic Concept of Choice? An Experimental Philosophy Study,” Economics & Philosophy 35(3), 461-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51667-1.50028-8
Nagel E. (1961), The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, London: Routledge.
Nersessian N. J. (2006), “The Cognitive-Cultural Systems of the Research Laboratory,” Organization Studies 27(1), 125-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606061842
Nersessian N. J. (2017), “Hybrid Devices: Embodiments of Culture in Biomedical Engineering” [in:] Cultures without Culturalism: The Making of Scientific Knowledge, K. Chemla, E. F. Keller (eds.), Durham–London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373094-006
Nöth W. (2018), “The Semiotics of Models,” Sign System Studies 46(1), 7-43. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2018.46.1.01
Putnam H., Walsh V. (eds.) (2011), The End of Value-Free Economics, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203154007
Reiss J. (2008), Error in Economics: Towards a More Evidence-Based Methodology, London–New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203086797.ch1
Reiss J. (2012), “Idealization and the Aims of Economics: Three Cheers for Instrumentalism,” Economics & Philosophy 28(3), 363-383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267112000284
Reiss J. (2014), “Struggling over the Soul of Economics: Objectivity versus Expertise” [in:] Experts and Consensus in Social Science, C. Martini, M. Boumans (eds.), Cham: Springer, 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08551-7_7
Robbins L. (1932), An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London: Macmillan.
Rodrik D. (2015), Economics Rules: Why Economics Works, When It Fails, and How to Tell the Difference, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rodrik D. (2018), “Second Thoughts on Economics Rules,” Journal of Economic Methodology 25(3), 276-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2018.1490441
Roland G. (2015), “Economics and Culture” [in:] Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, R. Scott, S. Kosslyn (eds.), London: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0091
Ross D. (2012), “Mäki’s Realism and Scope of Economics” [in:] Economics for Real: Uskali Mäki and the Place of Truth in Economics, A. Lehtinen, J. Kuorikoski, P. K. Ylikoski (eds.), Abingdon: Routledge, 181-194.
Samuelson P. (1975), “Maximum Principles in Analytical Economics,” Synthese 31(2), 323-344. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485982
Shore B. (1988), “An Introduction to the Work of Clifford Geertz,” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 71, 15-27.
Simon H. A. (1971), “Style in Design” [in:] Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association, Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University, 1-10.
Simon H. A. (1998), “Economics as a Historical Science,” Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 13(2), 241-260.
Sorokin P. A. (1957), Social & Cultural Dynamics: A Study of Change in Major Systems of Art, Truth, Ethics, Law and Social Relationships, Boston: Porter Sargent.
Swoyer C. (1991), “Structural Representation and Surrogative Reasoning,” Synthese 87, 449-508. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00499820
Vromen J. (2021), “What are We Up To?,” Journal of Economic Methodology 28(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2020.1868768
Wartofsky M. W. (1979), Models: Representation and Scientific Understanding, Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2020.1868768
Weber M. (1949), “’Objectivity’ in Social Science and Social Policy” [in:] The Methodology of Social Sciences, Glencoe: The Free Press, 50-112.
Opublikowane
2022-02-20
Jak cytować
Boruszewski, J., & Nowak-Posadzy, K. (2022). Economic Models as Cultural Artifacts: A Philosophical Primer. Filozofia Nauki, 29(3), 63-87. https://doi.org/10.14394/filnau.2021.0016