Quiddytyzm i quidditas w metafizyce analitycznej

Słowa kluczowe: quidditism, properties, structuralism, causal powers, individuation, possible worlds, skepticism


The paper is a survey of contemporary quidditism, understood as two interrelated metaphysical positions — recombinatorial quidditism, which is an account of the nature of possibilities, and individuation quidditism, which is concerned with the problem of how to individuate properties. I have three aims: to examine the commitments and consequences of both views, to investigate the relationships between them, and to sketch the logic of the dispute between structuralism and
quidditism. I explain how these views relate to Ramseyan humility, according to which we cannot know the fundamental structure of the world.


Armstrong D. M. (1978), Universals and Scientific Realism (vol. 2), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2219454
Armstrong D. M. (1989), A Combinatorial Theory of Possibility, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139172226
Barker S. (2009), Dispositional Monism, Relational Constitution, and Quiddities, „Analysis” 69(2), 242-250. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anp009
Bird A. (2007), Nature’s Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Black R. (2000), Against Quidditism, „Australasian Journal of Philosophy” 78(1), 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400012349371
Campbell K. (1990), Abstract Particulars, Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.2307/2219793
Curtis B. L. (2016), Lewisian Quidditism, Humility, and Diffidence, „Philosophical Studies” 173(11), 3081-3099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0651-1
Divers J., Melia J. (2002), The Analytic Limit of Genuine Modal Realism, „Mind” 111(441), 15-36. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/111.441.15
Efird D., Stoneham T. (2008), What is the Principle of Recombination?, „Dialectica” 62, 483-494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2008.01159.x
Ellis B., Lierse C. (1994), Dispositional Essentialism, „Australasian Journal of Philosophy” 72(1), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409412345861
Field H. (1988), Realism, Mathematics, and Modality, Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics19881613
Fine K. (1995), Senses of Essence [w:] Modality, Morality, and Belief, W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53-73.
Hawthorne J., Cover J. A. (1996), Haecceitism and Anti-haecceitism in Leibniz’s Philosophy, „Noûs” 30(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2216301
Hawthorne J. (2001), Causal Structuralism, „Philosophical Perspectives” 15, 361-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.35.s15.16
Heil J. (2003), From an Ontological Point of View, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199259747.001.0001
Hildebrand T. (2016), Two Types of Quidditism, „Australasian Journal of Philosophy” 94(3), 516-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2015.1112418
Ingarden R. (1961), Spór o istnienie świata, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Kaplan D. (1975), How to Russell a Frege-Church, „The Journal of Philosophy” 72(19), 716-729. https://doi.org/10.2307/2024635
Kripke S. (2001), Nazywanie i konieczność, tłum. B. Chwedeńczuk, Warszawa: Aletheia.
Lenart K. (2018), Esencjalizm, antyhaecceityzm i haecceityzm, „Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny HYBRIS” 44, 131-151.
Leuenberger S. (2010), Humility and Constraints on O-language, „Philosophical Studies” 149(3), 327-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9352-3
Lewis D. (1986), On the Plurality of Worlds, Oxford: Blackwell.
Lewis D. (2009), Ramseyan Humility [w:] Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism, D. Braddon-Mitchell, R. Nola (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 203-222. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012560.003.0009
Locke D. (2012), Quidditism without Quiddities, „Philosophical Studies” 160(3), 345-363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-011-9722-5
Maurin A. S. (2011), An Argument for the Existence of Tropes, „Erkenntnis” 74(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-010-9252-0
Moreland P. J. (1998), Theories of Individuation: A Reconsideration of Bare Particulars, „Pacific Philosophical Quarterly” 79(3), 251-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0114.00061
Parsons T. (1980), Nonexistent Objects, New Haven: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185016
Park W. (1990), Haecceitas and Bare Particular, „Review of Metaphysics” 44(2), 375-397.
Plantinga A. (1976), Actualism and Possible Worlds, „Theoria” 42(1-3), 139-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1976.tb00681.x
Plantinga A. (1979), De essentia, „Grazer Philosophische Studien” 7, 101-121. https://doi.org/10.5840/gps19797/819
Platon (2012), Sofista [w:] Uczta. Polityk. Sofista. Eutyfron, tłum. W. Witwicki, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 221-313.
Ramsey F. P. (1990), Theories [w:] F. P. Ramsey: Philosophical Papers, D. H. Mellor (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 112-136.
Roca-Royes S. (2011), Essential Properties and Individual Essences, „Philosophy Compass” 6(1), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00364.x
Rosenkrantz G. S. (1993), Haecceity: An Ontological Essay, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8175-2
Salmon N. (1996), Trans-world Identification and Stipulation, „Philosophical Studies” 84(2/3), 203-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354487
Schaffer J. (2005), Quiddistic Knowledge, „Philosophical Studies” 123(1-2), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-5221-2
Shoemaker S. (1980). Causality and Properties [w:] Time and Cause, P. van Inwagen (ed.), Dordrecht: Springer, 109-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3528-5_7
Sider T. (2006), Bare Particulars, „Philosophical Perspectives” 20, 387-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2006.00112.x
Smith D. C. (2016), Quid quidditism est?, „Erkenntnis” 81(2), 237-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-015-9737-y
Wang J. (2016), The Nature of Properties: Causal Essentialism and Quidditism, „Philosophy Compass” 11(3), 168-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12307
Williams D. C. (1953), On the Elements of Being: II, „Review of Metaphysics” 7(2), 171-192.
Wilson J. (2015), Hume’s Dictum and Metaphysical Modality [w:] The Blackwell Companion to David Lewis, B. Loewer, J. Schaffer (eds.), Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 138-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118398593.ch10
Whittle A. (2006), On an Argument for Humility, „Philosophical Studies” 130, 461-497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-5751-7
Jak cytować
Lenart, K. (2020). Quiddytyzm i quidditas w metafizyce analitycznej. Filozofia Nauki, 28(1), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.14394/filnau.2020.0003